Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "DHECC - Red∞mption?":
I’m not sure this 495 went through the proper channels. PAJ was to provide an outline then both parties the PSC and BP could argue or appeal.
It seems very strange that the judge granted or adopted 495 just to vacate the injunction without any changes to PAJ proposal.
Can a legal mind look into the process and confirm it was carried out properly?
I've been wondering about this as well. How was it just adopted without any argument from the PSC or Juneau? Any legal eagles out there have an answer?