Admittedly, I too, was amused ( in a pitiful way) at this guy's attempt to berate Oyster by referring to him with every seafood moniker he could muster, other than an oyster, i.e., reveling that he made "clam chowder" out of him.
Let me help you out with some analogies, brah:
Did you put him on a cracker and slurp him down? Did you irradiate him and make him taste bad? Could you not even swallow that oyster if it was on a saltine with Tobasco? Did you expose him for the bottom feeder he really is? Did you shuck him with one hand? Did you expose that oyster as having no pearl?
Aside from backpedaling on his previous attempt to suggest Mitch Landrieu is racist by taking a quote Mitch made, in a video, completely out of context....this guy's current thesis seems to be:
Let’s talk about opportunity, which is what Mitch, I’m sure, says he believes in. Then why not give somebody else the opportunity to be mayor?
So Mitch doesn't believe in opportunity because he's running for mayor? Is that the point of this post, titled, "Why Mitch"?
or is it this:
But Mitch, you care so much for New Orleans you’d rather smother those ideas with your tired and tried ideas that has brought New Orleans from the city you once knew to the city it became.
Let me get this right....Mitch Landrieu is responsible for the evolution of the city from some undetermined point residing in his memory until the present? Did he think the city into existence? Exactly what position did Landrieu hold that gave him such omnipotent power over the city of New Orleans? I had no idea the Lt. Governor position or serving in the LA State Legislature ordained one with the powers of Vishnu over New Orleans. If you don't get that reference, Avman, email Bobby J....or ask Maitri.
But wait, I think I get the gist of it in this paragraph:
I find that Louisiana isn’t short on people with ideas, but Louisiana has an abundance of are politicians who run for office, and instead of doing to job they were elected to do, immediately start looking for something else to run for. Some of it, I understand. Take Charlie Melancon, I don’t want Charlie Melancon as my next Senator, but I understand why he’s running, it’s a step up for Representative.
So the real thesis is people shouldn't run for an office if this guy doesn't understand why they are running. Now I get it. That and Mitch is the death knell of opportunity for New Orleans because he is mystically responsible for every bad thing that has happened to it....things which douche fails to describe...probably to avoid exposing the racist implications of his perspective.
The anti-Landrieu arguments get more pathetic with every election. I keep waiting for "Mitch eats his boogers." Or, "Mitch sniffs his own farts." This guy has already tried, "Mitch has a funny head"...and he couldn't even get that adolescent snark right, unless there really is such a thing as morris code.
Somebody give me a word for this...please.
UPDATE: As I was writing this post, Oyster was responding.
UPDATE 2: While this isn't the actual word I was looking for, it should definitely be put into circulation:
Syllodomy: the absolute pundit ass'fuck of syllogism.
Example: If I say + B = C, then you better believe it.