Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "DHECC - Blood in the water":
Today BP filed a motion for all of the information requested in the above letter. They claim they are entitled to more than the "non-parties" (Sutton, reitano, andry and Lerner). Interesting choice of words. Since they basically make the same argument for discovery as andry and Lerner, I guess they wanted to give the judge a reason to grant their motion while still denying andry and Lerner's. Waste of paper. Since when does this judge need a reason to violate due process or the federal rules?
BP Memo in support of discovery
Freeh letter to BP
Juneau letter to BP Counse