Item B appears to be the NOPD development project which wasn't listed in the original RFP. I'd like to find out more about exactly what they're doing there and why this wasn't spelled out in the original RFP.
Item C pretty much leaves the door open for additional billing for "other projects or additional projects". That's a pretty ambiguous statement.
Item C also contains a really interesting line in that it states that MSF may require third party software, hardware, and services to which the City will be responsible for paying outside of the allotted 1.9 million. Really? So now the requirement of providing the CMS comes full circle....why exactly did we contract a company that couldn't provide the services we needed? On some level it would seem we just hired a company for approx. 1.9 milion to go out and spend more money to get stuff done.
I'm no contract expert but it seems to me this contract doesn't really define much....it seems rather open ended.
I'd love to hear from all you tech guys on your opinion....click on the link to blow the picture up. I'm sorry i can't provide a better image or format but Blogger is pretty limited in that capacity....very aggravating.