Yesterday, Louis Freeh filed this motion to claw back a seafood claim against a guy named Jarrod A. Burrle.
Burrle just happens to be an Andry Lerner client. It appears Freeh only has eyes for Andry Lerner.
It's amazing that the guy has over 70 people in the office, making over 3 million a month, yet he can only focus on a single law firm. Does that seem a little strange?
I was also told that Burrle is Andry Lerner attorney Christine Mancuso's client. You remember her? She provided the witness testimony that Freeh "interpreted" to base his claim that Christine Reitano was attempting to negotiate a larger referral fee for the Thonn claim. Mancuso later signed an affidavit saying Freeh was mistaken and that she never said that.
What a coinkydink....the guy has hundreds of thousands of claims to scour and he happens to choose one of Mancuso's? You think that may be a vendetta?